[ENG] STEEM dev with python

-

by joviansummer
original STEEMIT post: https://steemit.com/blog/@joviansummer/eng-steem-dev-with-python

This post is a reply to @moecki's comment, but might be helpful for anyone thinking about interacting with STEEM blockchain with python.

There are 2 python libraries for STEEM. One is steem-python, and the other is beem. I'm not sure either one is actively maintained, but in my opinion both are quite usable.

Documents for steem-python can be found here:

https://steem.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

Documents for beem can be found here:

https://beem.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

As for myself, I'm using beem for my dev projects. I started with steem-python but after a while ended up with beem.

Here is a basic example of upvoting with beem:

https://steemit.com/blog/@joviansummer/4tnyma-beem/

It's explained in Korean, but you'll quickly get the idea by reading the code.

Thanks for reading!

@joviansummer's STEEM projects

@jswit witness project:
I'm running a STEEM witness node. I'd really appreciate it if you vote for my witness account @jswit. (https://steemitwallet.com/~witnesses)
[ENG] Introducing @jswit witness project

@jsup curation project:
[ENG] Introduction to @jsup curation project
[ENG] Using @jsup curation project as an auto-voting agent
[ENG] jsup 2.0 - make your upvote great again

jSTEEM project:
jSTEEM project - STEEM blockchain explorer on Telegram messenger

STEEM.NFT project:
STEEM.NFT - Preserve your art on Steemit & IPFS

Steemit-Search project:
Steemit-Search: a simple website for post searching

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GentBG - why bother to burn STEEM?

-
Image
by joviansummer original STEEMIT post: https://steemit.com/blog/@joviansummer/gentbg-why-bother-to-burn-steem GentBG - a new experiment to burn STEEM Hello, this is @joviansummer(witness: @jswit). I'd like to briefly explain why I bothered to start @gentbg experiment. Unlike bitcoin, STEEM has no supply limit. As long as STEEM exists, newly minted STEEM will be added to total supply. If we can't maintain corresponding demand or reduce supply, downward pressure on STEEM price can be a big challenge. @gentbg project is an experiment to reduce STEEM supply by burning. @gentbg will burn liquid author reward and delegate SP reward to @jsup to get amplified upvotes. The main purpose is to create a perpetual STEEM burning loop. I added a bit of fun factor via AI-generated images, to incentivize giving upvotes to @gentbg's posts. If you have some spare voting power, you can contribute to burning STEEM by giving upvotes to @gentbg's posts. Initial run of this experiment wil...
Read more

GentBG will continue to burn STEEM, with reduced posting frequency

-
Image
by joviansummer original STEEMIT post: https://steemit.com/blog/@joviansummer/gentbg-will-continue-to-burn-steem-with-reduced-posting-frequency Hello, this is @joviansummer(witness: @jswit). GentBG project has been going on for a few month. For more information about this project, check the following posts: GentBG - a new experiment to burn STEEM GentBG - why bother to burn STEEM? I'm making some changes to GentBG project's configurations. Unfortunately, this project haven't gained enough traction, but considering that burning STEEM is necessary(because STEEM supply has no limit) I'm going to continue this project as long as possible. The problem is that AI technology is not cheap. So I'm planning to change configuration to reduce the number of images per week from 2 to 1. Also, I don't think I can guarantee that image will be available every week. There might be a week without image. The current batch of images will be exhausted on September 18th. Configur...
Read more

스티미언의 영향력 지수 계산

-
by joviansummer original STEEMIT post: https://steemit.com/blog/@joviansummer/5qvaqw 오늘 이런 저런 생각을 하다가 문득 떠오른 내용인데, 잊어버리기 전에 적어 둡니다. 스티미언이 스팀 생태계에 행사할 수 있는 정량적인 영향력에 대해 생각해 보았습니다. 좋은 글을 많이 썼다거나 서비스를 개발했다거나 아는 사람이 많다거나 이런 정성적인 영향력과는 별도로, 수량으로 표시할 수 있는 영향력에 대한 것입니다. 일단 직접적인 수량은 보유한 스팀파워입니다. 예를 들어 50만sp를 보유하고 있다면, 아마 고래라고 칭해도 될 것 같습니다. 그런데, 조금 더 생각해 보면 영향력을 보유한 스팀파워만으로 측정하여 고래라고 간주하는 것은 과도하게 단순화시킨 감이 없지 않습니다. 현재 수량화된 측면에서 스팀 생태계에 영향력을 행사할 수 있는 방법은 2가지가 있습니다. 이 2가지 방법은 스팀파워를 지닌 스티미언 모두에게 유효합니다. 첫번째 방법은 업보팅입니다. 스티미언은 나에게 크게 보팅해 주는 사람의 의견에 영향을 받을 수밖에 없습니다. 큰 스팀파워로 보팅해 주는 스티미언이 많을 수록 커뮤니티가 활성화되고 신규 사용자가 유입될 가능성이 높아집니다. 방글라데시 커뮤니티가 실제 사례라고 할 수 있을 것 같습니다. @jungjunghoon님의 일파만파 운동은 보팅의 영향력을 확대하여 커뮤니티를 활성화하려는 시도라고 생각됩니다. @jsup의 후원 보팅 기능도 이러한 취지로 개발되었습니다. 두번째 방법은 증인투표입니다. 스팀 블럭체인은 증인들이 운영하는 서버(증인 노드)에 의해 유지되기 때문에, 누가 블럭체인을 유지할 것인지를 결정하는 증인투표는 일종의 주권 행사라고 할 수 있습니다. 최상위 증인 20명은 한달에 약 1만스팀을 증인 보상으로 받게 됩니다. 서버 운영비를 충당해야 되므로 1만스팀 전체가 수익이 되는 것은 아니지만 그래도 상당한 수입입니다. 하위 증인들은 순위에 따라 보상을 받는데 21위라고 해도 한달에 ...
Read more